{"id":14632,"date":"2022-10-06T03:45:40","date_gmt":"2022-10-06T00:45:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/?p=14632"},"modified":"2022-10-06T04:03:48","modified_gmt":"2022-10-06T01:03:48","slug":"yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/","title":{"rendered":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461<\/b><\/h1>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Vekaleti Olmayan Avukat Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lmakla \u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r.
\n\nCeza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda Avukat\u0131n Vekil Tayin Edildi\u011finin Mahkemeye Bildirmesi Yeterlidir.
\n\nSadece Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lan, Ba\u015fka Bir \u0130\u015flem Yapmayan Avukat,
\u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r.

Savunmas\u0131n\u0131 Avukat\u0131 ile Birlikte Yapan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Avukat\u0131nda Yaz\u0131l\u0131 Vekaletname Bulunmas\u0131na Gerek yoktur.<\/span><\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

YARGITAY KARARI\n<\/h4>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

T.C YARGITAY
.Ceza Genel Kurulu
Esas: 2016\/ 1421
Karar: 2020 \/ 461
Karar Tarihi: 17.11.2020<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Karar\u0131 veren<\/p>

Yarg\u0131tay Dairesi : (Kapat\u0131lan) 21. Ceza Dairesi<\/p>

Mahkemesi :Asliye Ceza<\/p>

Say\u0131s\u0131 : 166-72<\/p>

San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131nda, yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonucunda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 204\/1 ve 53. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca 3 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis, 765 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK\u2019n\u0131n 503\/1, 522\/1 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca da 2 y\u0131l 8 ay hapis ve 10.125 TL adli para cezas\u0131 ile cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na ve hak yoksunlu\u011funa ili\u015fkin Yeni\u015fehir Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince verilen 02.03.2011 tarihli ve 166-72 say\u0131l\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmesi \u00fczerine dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesince 24.06.2014 tarih ve 11777-12380 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>

“7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu’nun 11. maddesi uyar\u0131nca vekille takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi cihetle, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunda haz\u0131r bulunan ve yoklu\u011funda karar verilen m\u00fcdafii Av. …\u2019a tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir belgeye rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan varsa dosyas\u0131na konulmas\u0131, aksi halde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde tebli\u011fi ile buna ili\u015fkin belge ve verilmesi halinde temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin de eklenerek iadesinin temini i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdisine” karar verilmi\u015f olup Yerel Mahkemece san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisine gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisince de temyiz edilmesi neticesinde Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen ek tebli\u011fname do\u011frultusunda dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 21. Ceza Dairesince 02.12.2015 tarih ve 9300-5769 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>

“Tebligat Kanununun 35. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, 08.07.2011 tarihlerinde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f i\u015flemi usul\u00fcne uygun de\u011fil ise de, an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 32. maddesinde belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, ‘tebli\u011f usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, muhatab\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenmesiyle ge\u00e7erli’ olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, 01.11.2012 tarihinde cezaevine al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 20\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcmden haberdar olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 27.12.2012 tarihli temyiz istemi yasal s\u00fcresinden sonra vaki olmakla ve sadece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakalama karar\u0131 \u00fczerine talimatla yap\u0131lan sorgusuna i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi, daha sonra ise vekaletname vermedi\u011fi gibi hi\u00e7bir yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemine de kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen Av. …’\u0131n ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdafiisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve Av. …’\u0131n vaki temyiz istemlerinin 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 8\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’nun 317. maddesi uyar\u0131nca reddine” karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>

Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise 14.10.2016 tarih ve 243107 say\u0131 ile;<\/p>

“…Dosyan\u0131n incelenmesinde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n talimatla al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin Edremit 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinin 26.09.2008 tarih ve 2008\/168 M\u00fct.say\u0131l\u0131 talimat sorgu zapt\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ‘San\u0131k haklar\u0131m\u0131 anlad\u0131m. A\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunaca\u011f\u0131m. Ancak vekilim olan Av. … ile birlikte yapaca\u011f\u0131m duru\u015fmadan ba\u011f\u0131\u015f\u0131k tutulmak istiyorum.’ \u015feklinde beyanda bulundu\u011fu ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcdafii olarak belirtti\u011fi Av. …’\u0131n huzurunda al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafiinin esas mahkemesindeki sonraki duru\u015fmalara i\u015ftirak etmedikleri, karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve m\u00fcdafiinin yoklu\u011funda verildi\u011fi, gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii yerine do\u011frudan san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011fe \u00e7\u0131kart\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Tebligat Yasas\u0131’n\u0131n 21\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca 06.07.2011 tarihinde san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mernis adresi oldu\u011fu belirtilen adrese yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, tebligat mazbatas\u0131 incelendi\u011finde, san\u0131k adresten ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, tebligat\u0131n k\u00f6y muhtar azas\u0131n\u0131n imzas\u0131na yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtildi\u011fi, kap\u0131ya tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsedilmedi\u011fi, bu nedenle yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu,<\/p>

01.11.2012 tarihinde itiraza konu dosyan\u0131n infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in cezaevine al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, 27.12.2012 tarihinde h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etti\u011fi, Dairenin san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011fi i\u00e7in dosyay\u0131 mahalline g\u00f6ndermesi \u00fczerine h\u00fckm\u00fcn 19.08.2014 tarihinde san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin de, 26.08.2014 tarihinde h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>

\u00d6ncelikle, san\u0131k huzurunda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunda bulunan san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edilmesi yerine, do\u011frudan san\u0131\u011fa tebligatta bulunulmas\u0131n\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu, bu nedenle sonradan san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine yap\u0131lan tebligat \u00fczerine san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiinin yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu temyizin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu,<\/p>

Yine san\u0131\u011fa yap\u0131lan 06.07.2011 tarihli tebligat\u0131n usuls\u00fcz oldu\u011fu, cezaevinde san\u0131\u011fa h\u00fckm\u00fcn tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir tebligat belgesi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, san\u0131k cezaevine al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 yasan\u0131n 20\/4 maddesi uyar\u0131nca verilen bir belgenin de dosya aras\u0131nda bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6yle bir belge verildi\u011fi kabul edilse bile, karar i\u00e7eri\u011fini bilmeyen san\u0131\u011fa karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011finden bahsedilemeyece\u011fi, cezaevine al\u0131nan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etti\u011fi tarih olan 27.12.2012 tarihinde h\u00fck\u00fcmden haberdar oldu\u011funun kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi, yine san\u0131k m\u00fcdafiine tebligatta bulunulan tarih olan 19.08.2014 tarihinden \u00f6nce karar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde tebli\u011f edildi\u011finden bahsedilemeyece\u011finden, 19.08.2014 tarihinden \u00f6nce san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu 27.12.2012 tarihli temyizinin her durumda s\u00fcresinde kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>

A\u00e7\u0131klanan bu nedenlerle, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve m\u00fcdafiinin temyizlerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu ve dosyan\u0131n temyizen esastan incelenmesi gerekti\u011fi” g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyle itiraz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftur.<\/p>

CMK’n\u0131n 308. maddesi uyar\u0131nca inceleme yapan Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 21. Ceza Dairesince 24.10.2016 tarih ve 10050-6306 say\u0131 ile itiraz nedenlerinin yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden bahisle Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilen dosya, Ceza Genel Kurulunca de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015f ve a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7elerle karara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>

T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA<\/p>

CEZA GENEL KURULU KARARI<\/p>

\u0130tiraz\u0131n kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re inceleme, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmleri ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>

\u00d6zel Daire ile Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131nda olu\u015fan ve Ceza Genel Kurulunca \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcmlenmesi gereken uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakalama \u00fczerine 26.09.2008 tarihinde Edremit 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 savunmas\u0131nda yan\u0131nda bulunan Avukat …\u2019\u0131n m\u00fcdafilik s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 kazan\u0131p kazanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, bu ba\u011flamda gerek\u00e7eli karar tebli\u011finin ne \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 15.02.2013 tarihli temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresinde kabul edilip edilemeyece\u011finin belirlenmesine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>

\u0130ncelenen dosya kapsam\u0131ndan;<\/p>

San\u0131k … hakk\u0131nda resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7undan a\u00e7\u0131lan kamu davas\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma evresinde ifadesinin al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kovu\u015fturma evresinde ise yakalama \u00fczerine Edremit 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde \u201cHaklar\u0131m\u0131 anlad\u0131m. A\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunaca\u011f\u0131m. Ancak vekilim Av. … ile birlikte yapaca\u011f\u0131m.\u201d dedikten sonra savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en Avukat ile birlikte yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n devam\u0131nda ise san\u0131k ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131 birlikte yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 Avukat …\u2019\u0131n duru\u015fmalara kat\u0131lmad\u0131klar\u0131, Avukat …\u2019\u0131n dosyaya vek\u00e2letname sunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, yarg\u0131lama sonucunda da, Yeni\u015fehir Asliye Ceza Mahkemesince san\u0131k ve Avukat …\u2019\u0131n yoklu\u011funda san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmleri kuruldu\u011fu,<\/p>

Gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011fi i\u00e7in; Metris 1 Nolu T Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna g\u00f6nderilen yaz\u0131ya, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 18.03.2011 tarihinde Silivri 1 Nolu L Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna nakil edildi\u011fi cevab\u0131, Silivri 1 Nolu L Tipi Kapal\u0131 Ceza \u0130nfaz Kurumuna g\u00f6nderilen yaz\u0131ya ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 16.04.2011 tarihinde tahliye oldu\u011fu cevab\u0131 verilerek her iki yaz\u0131da da san\u0131\u011fa karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edilemedi\u011finin belirtildi\u011fi,<\/p>

Bunun \u00fczerine Yerel Mahkemece, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n Edremit 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde ifadesini verdi\u011fi s\u0131rada bildirdi\u011fi \u201cSo\u011fanyenmez Mah. … Edremit\/Bal\u0131kesir\u201d adresine \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan tebligata ili\u015fkin tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131nda; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ismen tan\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahisle tebligat\u0131n iade edildi\u011fi bilgilerinin; san\u0131\u011f\u0131n o tarihte mernis adresi olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcnen \u201c… \u00c7ataltepe K\u00f6y\u00fc Kestel\/Bursa\u201d adresine yap\u0131lan tebligata ili\u015fkin tebligat par\u00e7as\u0131nda ise Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 21. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n k\u00f6y muhtar azas\u0131 \u00dcnal Y\u0131lmaz imzas\u0131na 08.07.2011 tarihinde tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi bilgilerinin yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 21. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan tebligatta, tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir ibarenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>

Yerel Mahkemece Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 21. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan tebligat \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011fi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 01.11.2012 tarihinde yakalanarak cezaevine al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, cezaevinde san\u0131\u011fa davaya konu su\u00e7lardan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin i\u00e7timal\u0131 cezas\u0131 olan 5 y\u0131l 14 ay hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 ihtiva eden 08.11.2012 tarihli m\u00fcddetnamenin imzalat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bir n\u00fcshas\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi,<\/p>

San\u0131\u011f\u0131n, Yeni\u015fehir Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve Yeni\u015fehir Asliye Ceza Mahkemesine 27.12.2012 tarihli iki ayr\u0131 dilek\u00e7e ile ba\u015fvurarak h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bilgisi d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda Yarg\u0131taya g\u00f6nderilip kesinle\u015ftirildi\u011finden bahsetmek suretiyle infaz\u0131n durdurulmas\u0131n\u0131 talep etti\u011fi, bu taleplerin reddedildi\u011fi, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan 15.02.2013 tarihli dilek\u00e7e ile de h\u00fck\u00fcmleri temyiz etti\u011fi ve Yerel Mahkemece 18.02.2013 tarihli tutanak tanzim edilerek dosyan\u0131n Yarg\u0131taya g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi,<\/p>

San\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilen h\u00fck\u00fcmleri inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesince; \u201c7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu’nun 11. maddesi uyar\u0131nca vekille takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi cihetle, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sorgusunda haz\u0131r bulunan ve yoklu\u011funda karar verilen m\u00fcdafi Av. …\u2019a tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin bir belgeye rastlan\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan varsa dosyas\u0131na konulmas\u0131, aksi halde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisine usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde tebli\u011fi ile buna ili\u015fkin belge ve verilmesi halinde temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin de eklenerek iadesinin temini i\u00e7in dosyan\u0131n mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdiine\u201d karar verilmi\u015f olup bu karar do\u011frultusunda Yerel Mahkemece san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisine gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n 19.08.2014 tarihinde tebli\u011fi \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisince de 26.08.2014 tarihinde temyiz edildi\u011fi, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen ek tebli\u011fnameyle dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 21. Ceza Dairesince ise \u201cTebligat Kanununun 35. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, 08.07.2011 tarihlerinde yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f i\u015flemi usul\u00fcne uygun de\u011fil ise de, an\u0131lan Yasan\u0131n 32. maddesinde belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere, \u2018tebli\u011f usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, muhatab\u0131n \u00f6\u011frenmesiyle ge\u00e7erli\u2019 olaca\u011f\u0131ndan, 01.11.2012 tarihinde cezaevine al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 5275 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 20\/4. maddesi gere\u011fince h\u00fck\u00fcmden haberdar olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 27.12.2012 tarihli temyiz istemi yasal s\u00fcresinden sonra vaki olmakla ve sadece san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakalama karar\u0131 \u00fczerine talimatla yap\u0131lan sorgusuna i\u015ftirak etti\u011fi, daha sonra ise vekaletname vermedi\u011fi gibi hi\u00e7bir yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemine de kat\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edilen Av. …’\u0131n ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdafisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve Av. …’\u0131n vaki temyiz istemlerinin 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 8\/1. maddesi gere\u011fince uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’nun 317. maddesi uyar\u0131nca reddine\u201d karar verildi\u011fi,<\/p>

San\u0131k m\u00fcdafisi yap\u0131lan tebligat \u00fczerine h\u00fck\u00fcmleri temyiz etti\u011fi gibi ayn\u0131 tarihte verdi\u011fi bir ba\u015fka dilek\u00e7esinde ise \u201cG\u00f6nderilen gerek\u00e7eli karar ile mahkemeniz yukar\u0131daki karar numaral\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda san\u0131yorum bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k \u00fczerine tebligat taraf\u0131ma g\u00f6nderilmi\u015ftir. \u015e\u00f6yle ki bu dosyada taraf\u0131ma hi\u00e7bir zaman vekalet \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f ve bu dosyan\u0131n m\u00fcdafili\u011fi hi\u00e7bir zaman taraf\u0131mdan \u00fcstlenilmemi\u015ftir. Dosyada vekaletnamem olmadan vekil s\u0131fat\u0131 kazanmam m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Zannediyorum ki san\u0131\u011f\u0131n soru\u015fturma a\u015famas\u0131ndaki bir ifadesinde m\u00fcdafisi olarak soru\u015fturmaya kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmam bu yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011fa sebep olmu\u015f olabilir. Ancak san\u0131k\u00e7a \u015fahs\u0131ma hi\u00e7bir zaman vekalet \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Taraf\u0131ma g\u00f6nderilen gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n san\u0131\u011fa tebli\u011f edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu sebeple san\u0131\u011fa yeniden tebligat \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 taraf\u0131ma yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131kla g\u00f6nderilen tebligat\u0131n da dikkate al\u0131nmamas\u0131n\u0131 sayg\u0131yla bildiririm.\u201d \u015feklinde beyanda bulundu\u011fu,<\/p>

Anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>

Anayasa’n\u0131n \u201cHak arama h\u00fcrriyeti\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 36. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131;<\/p>

\u201cHerkes, me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak suretiyle yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahiptir…\u201d,<\/p>

\u201cTemel hak ve h\u00fcrriyetlerin korunmas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesinin birinci ve ikinci f\u0131kralar\u0131 ise;<\/p>

\u201cAnayasa ile tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f hak ve h\u00fcrriyetleri ihlal edilen herkes, yetkili makama geciktirilmeden ba\u015fvurma imkan\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131na sahiptir.<\/p>

Devlet, i\u015flemlerinde, ilgili ki\u015filerin hangi kanun yollar\u0131 ve mercilere ba\u015fvuraca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve s\u00fcrelerini belirtmek zorundad\u0131r…\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup Anayasam\u0131z\u0131n 36. maddesinde, herkesin, me\u015fru vas\u0131ta ve yollardan faydalanmak suretiyle yarg\u0131 mercileri \u00f6n\u00fcnde davac\u0131 veya daval\u0131 olarak iddia ve savunma ile adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na sahip oldu\u011fu, 40. maddesinde, Anayasa ile tan\u0131nm\u0131\u015f hak ve h\u00fcrriyetleri ihlal edilen herkesin, yetkili makama geciktirilmeden ba\u015fvurma imk\u00e2n\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>

CMK’n\u0131n \u201cKararlar\u0131n gerek\u00e7eli olmas\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 34. maddesinin ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131;<\/p>

\u201cKararlarda, ba\u015fvurulabilecek kanun yolu, s\u00fcresi, mercii ve \u015fekilleri belirtilir.\u201d,<\/p>

\u201cEski h\u00e2le getirme\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 40. maddesi ise;<\/p>

\u201c(1) Kusuru olmaks\u0131z\u0131n bir s\u00fcreyi ge\u00e7irmi\u015f olan ki\u015fi, eski hale getirme isteminde bulunabilir.<\/p>

(2) Kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 kendisine bildirilmemesi halinde de, ki\u015fi kusursuz say\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d bi\u00e7iminde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup CMK’n\u0131n 34. maddesinde, h\u00fck\u00fcm ve kararlardaki kanun yolu bildiriminin; ba\u015fvurulabilecek kanun yolu, mercisi, \u015fekli ve s\u00fcresini de kapsamas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu vurgulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 40. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda, kusuru olmaks\u0131z\u0131n bir s\u00fcreyi ge\u00e7irmi\u015f olan ki\u015finin, eski hale getirme isteminde bulunabilece\u011fi, ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131n\u0131n kendisine bildirilmemesi h\u00e2linde, ki\u015finin kusursuz say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>

Bu a\u015famada kararlar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ve tebli\u011fi ile temyiz talebi ve s\u00fcresi \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131nda fayda bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>

5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK\u2019n\u0131n \u201cKararlar\u0131n A\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131 ve Tebli\u011fi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 35. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda; \u201cKoruma tedbirlerine ili\u015fkin olanlar hari\u00e7, aleyhine kanun yoluna ba\u015fvurulabilecek h\u00e2kim veya mahkeme kararlar\u0131, haz\u0131r bulunamayan ilgilisine tebli\u011f olunur.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer verilmek suretiyle temyiz incelemesinin yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, temyiz kanun yoluna ba\u015fvuru hakk\u0131 bulunanlar\u0131n karar\u0131 tefhim veya tebli\u011f yoluyla \u00f6\u011frenmelerinin sa\u011flanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi kanuni bir mecburiyet olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>

1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’n\u0131n, 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8. maddesi uyar\u0131nca karar tarihi itibar\u0131yla uygulanmas\u0131 gereken 310. maddesinin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131; “Temyiz talebi, h\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhiminden bir hafta i\u00e7inde h\u00fckm\u00fc veren mahkemeye bir dilek\u00e7e verilmesi veya zab\u0131t katibine yap\u0131lacak beyanla olur. Beyan tutana\u011fa ge\u00e7irilir ve tutanak hakime tasdik ettirilir.” ikinci f\u0131kras\u0131 ise \u201cH\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhimi san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yoklu\u011funda olmu\u015fsa bu s\u00fcre tebli\u011f tarihinden ba\u015flar.\u201d \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131narak temyiz s\u00fcresinin y\u00fcze kar\u015f\u0131 verilen kararlarda h\u00fckm\u00fcn tefhimi ile, yoklukta verilen kararlarda ise gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fi ile ba\u015flayaca\u011f\u0131 belirtilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>

Ki\u015filerin hak arama h\u00fcrriyetlerinin Anayasa ve di\u011fer kanunlarla g\u00fcvence alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu hakk\u0131n kullan\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in devlet i\u015flemlerinin ki\u015filere usul\u00fcne uygun olarak bildirilmesi gerekti\u011fi ile temyiz talebi ve s\u00fcresi a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131ktan sonra, i\u015flemin muhatab\u0131 olan ki\u015filere hangi adreste ve 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu’nun hangi maddeleri dikkate al\u0131narak tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi hususunun da incelenmesi \u00f6nem arz etmektedir.<\/p>

7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu’nun \u201cBilinen adreste tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 10. maddesinde;<\/p>

\u201cTebligat, tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahsa bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>

Bilinen en son adresin tebligata elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 veya tebligat yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde, muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sisteminde bulunan yerle\u015fim yeri adresi, bilinen en son adresi olarak kabul edilir ve tebligat buraya yap\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>

\u015eu kadar ki; kendisine tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahs\u0131n m\u00fcracaat\u0131 veya kabul\u00fc \u015fartiyle her yerde tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 caizdir.\u201d d\u00fczenlemesine yer verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>

Buna g\u00f6re tebligat, \u00f6ncelikle tebli\u011f yap\u0131lacak \u015fahs\u0131n bilinen en son adresinde yap\u0131l\u0131r. Adres, muhatab\u0131n konut veya i\u015f yeri adresi olabilir. Bilinen en son adresin tespitinde, tebli\u011f isteyenin beyan\u0131, muhatab\u0131n veya di\u011fer ilgililerin bildirimleri ya da mevcut belgeler esas al\u0131n\u0131r. Ancak, tebligat\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karan makama bildirilen adresin, tebligata elveri\u015fli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 ya da bu adrese tebligat yap\u0131lamamas\u0131 h\u00e2llerinde, muhatab\u0131n 5490 say\u0131l\u0131 N\u00fcfus Hizmetleri Kanunu’na g\u00f6re adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresi (MERN\u0130S) bilinen son adresi olarak kabul edilerek tebligat buraya yap\u0131lacakt\u0131r (Canan Ruhi, Ahmet Cemal Ruhi, Tebligat Hukuku, Se\u00e7kin Yay\u0131nevi, s. 82.).<\/p>

Adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresine (MERN\u0130S) tebligat\u0131n yap\u0131lma \u015fekli ise an\u0131lan Kanun\u2019un \u201cTebli\u011f imkans\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve tebell\u00fc\u011fden imtina\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 21. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda;<\/p>

\u201cG\u00f6sterilen adres muhatab\u0131n adres kay\u0131t sistemindeki adresi olup, muhatap o adreste hi\u00e7 oturmam\u0131\u015f veya o adresten s\u00fcrekli olarak ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa dahi, tebli\u011f memuru tebli\u011f olunacak evrak\u0131, o yerin muhtar veya ihtiyar heyeti azas\u0131ndan birine veyahut zab\u0131ta amir veya memurlar\u0131na imza kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda teslim eder ve tesell\u00fcm edenin adresini ihtiva eden ihbarnameyi g\u00f6sterilen adresteki binan\u0131n kap\u0131s\u0131na yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131r. \u0130hbarnamenin kap\u0131ya yap\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r.” bi\u00e7iminde a\u00e7\u0131klanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>

Konumuzla ilgisi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan usul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 tebli\u011fin hangi h\u00e2llerde ge\u00e7erli olaca\u011f\u0131na da de\u011finilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>

7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu’nun \u201cUsul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 tebli\u011fin h\u00fckm\u00fc\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 32. maddesi;<\/p>

\u201cTebli\u011f usul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, muhatab\u0131 tebli\u011fe muttali olmu\u015f ise muteber say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>

Muhatab\u0131n beyan etti\u011fi tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi addolunur.\u201d,<\/p>

Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmelik\u2019in \u201cUsul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 Tebli\u011fin H\u00fckm\u00fc\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 53. maddesi ise;<\/p>

\u201c(1) Tebli\u011f, usul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olsa bile, muhatab\u0131 tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f ise ge\u00e7erlidir. Aksi takdirde tebligat yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r. Muhatap, her ne \u015fekilde olursa olsun tebli\u011f evrak\u0131n\u0131 veya davetiyeyi al\u0131rsa ya da bunlar\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011fini \u00f6\u011frenirse tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frenmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>

(2) Muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi tarih, tebli\u011f tarihi olarak kabul edilir<\/p>

(3) Tebli\u011fin usul\u00fcne ayk\u0131r\u0131 yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 halinde, muhatab\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frendi\u011finin ve bunun tarihinin iddia ve ispat\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir.\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmek suretiyle san\u0131\u011f\u0131n tebli\u011fi \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fini beyan etti\u011fi veya h\u00e2l ve hareketleri ile bunu ortaya koydu\u011fu tarihte tebli\u011fin ge\u00e7erli olaca\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>

Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu ve Ceza Dairelerince teredd\u00fcde mahal b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclen uygulamalara g\u00f6re de; yoklukta kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyiz hakk\u0131 olanlara usul\u00fcne uygun tebli\u011f edilmedi\u011fi h\u00e2llerde temyiz s\u00fcresi i\u015flemeye ba\u015flamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan, \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine verilen temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>

Di\u011fer taraftan 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun \u201cVekile ve kanuni m\u00fcmesile tebligat\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 11. maddesi;<\/p>

\u201cVekil vas\u0131tas\u0131yla takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat vekile yap\u0131l\u0131r. Vekil birden \u00e7ok ise bunlardan birine tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131 yeterlidir. E\u011fer tebligat birden fazla vekile yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise, bunlardan ilkine yap\u0131lan tebli\u011f tarihi as\u0131l tebli\u011f tarihi say\u0131l\u0131r. Ancak, Ceza Muhakemeleri Usulu Kanununun, kararlar\u0131n san\u0131klara tebli\u011f edilmelerine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmleri sakl\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d \u015feklinde h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131narak vekil arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi emredici olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>

Gelinen bu a\u015famada konumuzla ilgisi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan m\u00fcdafilik s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n kazan\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in avukata san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan verilmi\u015f bir vek\u00e2letnamenin bulunmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunun da irdelenmesinde fayda bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>

CMK\u2019n\u0131n \u201c\u015e\u00fcphelinin veya san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdafi se\u00e7imi\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 149. maddesi;<\/p>

\u201c\u015e\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131k, soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda bir veya birden fazla m\u00fcdafiin yard\u0131m\u0131ndan yararlanabilir; kanun\u00ee temsilcisi varsa, o da \u015f\u00fcpheliye veya san\u0131\u011fa m\u00fcdafi se\u00e7ebilir.<\/p>

Soru\u015fturma evresinde, ifade almada en \u00e7ok \u00fc\u00e7 avukat haz\u0131r bulunabilir.<\/p>

Soru\u015fturma ve kovu\u015fturma evrelerinin her a\u015famas\u0131nda avukat\u0131n, \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131kla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme, ifade alma veya sorgu s\u00fcresince yan\u0131nda olma ve hukuk\u00ee yard\u0131mda bulunma hakk\u0131 engellenemez, k\u0131s\u0131tlanamaz.\u201d \u015feklinde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olup \u015f\u00fcpheli veya san\u0131\u011fa hukuki yard\u0131mda bulunan avukat\u0131n mahkemeye vek\u00e2letname ibraz etmesi gibi bir zorunluluk getirilmedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>

CMK\u2019n\u0131n \u201cAvukat\u0131n ba\u015fvurma hakk\u0131\u201d ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 261. maddesinde de; \u201cAvukat, m\u00fcdafili\u011fini veya vekilli\u011fini \u00fcstlendi\u011fi ki\u015filerin a\u00e7\u0131k arzusuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olmamak ko\u015fuluyla kanun yollar\u0131na ba\u015fvurabilir.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcyle dosyada san\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k bir muhalefeti olmamas\u0131 h\u00e2linde avukata temyiz hakk\u0131 verilmi\u015f ve yine CMK\u2019n\u0131n 149. maddesiyle benzer \u015fekilde avukat\u0131n vek\u00e2letnamesinin bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi gibi bir zorunluluk \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>

M\u00fcdafilik s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n kazan\u0131lmas\u0131 ve bu g\u00f6revin tan\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 yetkilerin icra edilmesi i\u00e7in taraflar aras\u0131nda bir vek\u00e2let s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi gereklidir. Bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin mutlaka noter taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f hatta yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir vek\u00e2letname \u015feklinde olmas\u0131 gerekmemekte ve ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 hukukunda avukat\u0131n vekil tayin edildi\u011finin mahkemeye usul\u00fcne g\u00f6re bildirilmesi yeterlidir. Ancak uygulamada genellikle noterde d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f vek\u00e2letname ile m\u00fcdafi yetkilendirilmesinin yayg\u0131n oldu\u011fu bilinmektedir.<\/p>

Bu ba\u011flamda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n birlikte duru\u015fmaya gelerek h\u00e2kim huzurunda m\u00fcdafisi olarak kabul etti\u011fini bildirdi\u011fi avukat\u0131n m\u00fcdafilik s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 kazanaca\u011f\u0131, yard\u0131mc\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011fu san\u0131\u011f\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131k arzusuna muhalif olmamak \u015fart\u0131yla kanun yollar\u0131na da m\u00fcracaat edebilece\u011fi hususunda teredd\u00fct bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>

Ceza Genel Kurulunun 09.12.1974 tarihli ve 282-447 say\u0131l\u0131, 20.04.1992 tarihli ve 86-105 say\u0131l\u0131, \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Kurulunun 20.10.1975 tarihli ve 7-7 say\u0131l\u0131 kararlar\u0131nda da bu husus y\u00f6n\u00fcnden ayn\u0131 sonuca ula\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>

Bu a\u00e7\u0131klamalar \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde;<\/p>

Yerel Mahkemece san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin, Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 21. maddesinin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca yap\u0131lan 08.07.2011 tarihli tebligata g\u00f6re kesinle\u015ftirilmesi \u00fczerine 01.11.2012 tarihinde bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in cezaevine al\u0131nan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, 15.02.2013 tarihli dilek\u00e7esiyle h\u00fck\u00fcmleri temyiz etti\u011fi, temyiz istemi uyar\u0131nca dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesince; Tebligat Kanunu\u2019nun 11. maddesine g\u00f6re vekille takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi belirtilerek san\u0131\u011f\u0131n kovu\u015fturma evresinde ifadesi al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada savunmas\u0131n\u0131 birlikte yapmak istedi\u011fini belirtti\u011fi Avukat …\u2019a tebligat yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde verilen tevdi karar\u0131 \u00fczerine Yerel Mahkemece Avukat …\u2019a 19.08.2014 tarihinde karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fi, ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en Avukat taraf\u0131ndan da san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin 26.08.2014 tarihinde temyiz edildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>

Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen \u00d6zel Dairece; san\u0131\u011fa 08.07.2011 tarihinde yap\u0131lan tebligat\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ancak 01.11.2012 tarihinde cezaevine al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcmden haberdar olan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz isteminin yasal s\u00fcresinden sonra oldu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n yakalanmas\u0131 \u00fczerine talimatla yap\u0131lan sorgusuna i\u015ftirak eden ve daha sonra vek\u00e2letname ibraz etmedi\u011fi gibi hi\u00e7bir yarg\u0131lama i\u015flemine de kat\u0131lmayan Av. …’\u0131n ise san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fcdafisi s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 haiz olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafisinin temyiz istemlerinin reddine karar verilmi\u015f ise de;<\/p>

Kovu\u015fturma evresinde yakalama \u00fczerine Edremit 3. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesinde \u201cHaklar\u0131m\u0131 anlad\u0131m. A\u00e7\u0131klamada bulunaca\u011f\u0131m. Ancak vekilim Av. … ile birlikte yapaca\u011f\u0131m.\u201d dedikten sonra savunmas\u0131n\u0131 ad\u0131 ge\u00e7en Avukat ile birlikte yapan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, avukat\u0131yla aras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 bir vek\u00e2letname bulunmas\u0131na veya taraflarca aralar\u0131ndaki vek\u00e2let s\u00f6zle\u015fmesini ispat niteli\u011fi ta\u015f\u0131yan bir vek\u00e2letnamenin mahkemeye sunulmas\u0131na gerek olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ceza yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 hukukunda avukat\u0131n vekil tayin edildi\u011finin mahkemeye usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde bildirilmesinin yeterli oldu\u011fu hususlar\u0131 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulunduruldu\u011funda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, yakalama \u00fczerine al\u0131nan ifadesine ba\u015flamadan \u00f6nce Avukat …\u2019\u0131n vekili oldu\u011funu ve savunmas\u0131n\u0131 birlikte yapaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmek suretiyle usul\u00fcne uygun \u015fekilde vekilini Mahkemeye bildirdi\u011fi, Mahkemece de bildirilen m\u00fcdafi huzurunda san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00f6ylece dosya i\u00e7erisinde vek\u00e2letnamesi bulunmasa da Avukat …\u2019\u0131n m\u00fcdafilik s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>

Bu durumda 7201 say\u0131l\u0131 Tebligat Kanunu’nun 11. maddesi uyar\u0131nca vekille takip edilen i\u015flerde tebligat\u0131n vekile yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, dosya kapsam\u0131nda gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011fine ili\u015fkin ge\u00e7erli olan tebligat\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesinin tevdi karar\u0131 sonras\u0131nda Yerel Mahkemece san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisine yap\u0131lan 19.08.2014 tarihli tebligat oldu\u011fu, daha \u00f6nce yap\u0131lan tebligatlar\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun kabul edilemeyece\u011fi, san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisinin de kendisine yap\u0131lan tebligat sonucunda 26.08.2014 tarihinde verdi\u011fi temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu,<\/p>

\u00d6te yandan dosya kapsam\u0131nda, dava konusu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin infaz\u0131 i\u00e7in 01.11.2012 tarihinde cezaevine al\u0131nan san\u0131\u011fa cezaevinde gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131n tebli\u011f edildi\u011fine dair bir belgenin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sadece davaya konu su\u00e7lardan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin i\u00e7timal\u0131 cezas\u0131 olan 5 y\u0131l 14 ay hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131 ihtiva eden 08.11.2012 tarihli m\u00fcddetnamenin san\u0131\u011fa imzalat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve belirtilen tarihte bir n\u00fcshas\u0131n\u0131n verildi\u011fi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, hakk\u0131nda kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuraca\u011f\u0131 kanun yolunu, mercisini ve s\u00fcresini g\u00f6stermeyen m\u00fcddetname i\u00e7eri\u011finden de, verilen cezan\u0131n hangi mahkemece, hangi su\u00e7lardan verildi\u011fini ve ceza miktarlar\u0131n\u0131 anlamas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, anla\u015f\u0131lsa dahi bu \u015fekilde kesinle\u015fmi\u015f h\u00e2lde yap\u0131lan bildirimin san\u0131\u011f\u0131 yan\u0131lt\u0131c\u0131 nitelikte oldu\u011fu hususlar\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n 15.02.2013 tarihli temyizinin, dilek\u00e7eyi verdi\u011fi tarihte \u00f6\u011frenme \u00fczerine s\u00fcresinde yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 temyiz ba\u015fvurusu olarak kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi,\u00a0<\/p>

Sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>

Bu itibarla, Avukat …\u2019\u0131n san\u0131k m\u00fcdafisi s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 kazand\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131k ve m\u00fcdafisinin temyiz dilek\u00e7elerinin s\u00fcresinde oldu\u011fu ve san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin her iki temyiz istemi kapsam\u0131nda esastan incelenmesi gerekti\u011finden, dosyan\u0131n, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi amac\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Kurulunun 22.12.2016 tarihli ve 398 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile Yarg\u0131tay 21. Ceza Dairesinin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ayn\u0131 karar uyar\u0131nca bu Daireye ait i\u015flerin devredildi\u011fi Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na tevdi edilmesine karar verilmelidir.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
SONU\u00c7<\/b><\/h5>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

A\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle;

1- Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 itiraz\u0131n\u0131n KABUL\u00dcNE,

2- Yarg\u0131tay (Kapat\u0131lan) 21. Ceza Dairesinin 02.12.2015 tarihli ve 9300-5769 say\u0131l\u0131 san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda resm\u00ee belgede sahtecilik ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan kurulan mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ili\u015fen temyiz istemlerinin reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n\u0131n KALDIRILMASINA,

3- Dosyan\u0131n, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kurulan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenmesi amac\u0131yla Yarg\u0131tay Birinci Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k Kurulunun 22.12.2016 tarihli ve 398 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile Yarg\u0131tay 21. Ceza Dairesinin kapat\u0131lmas\u0131 nedeniyle ayn\u0131 karar uyar\u0131nca bu Daireye ait i\u015flerin devredildi\u011fi Yarg\u0131tay 11. Ceza Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na TEVD\u0130 ED\u0130LMES\u0130NE, 17.11.2020 tarihinde yap\u0131lan m\u00fczakerede oy birli\u011fiyle karar verildi.

<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 Vekaleti Olmayan Avukat Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lmakla \u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r. Ceza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda Avukat\u0131n Vekil Tayin Edildi\u011finin Mahkemeye Bildirmesi Yeterlidir. Sadece Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lan, Ba\u015fka Bir \u0130\u015flem Yapmayan Avukat,\u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r. Savunmas\u0131n\u0131 Avukat\u0131 ile Birlikte Yapan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Avukat\u0131nda Yaz\u0131l\u0131 Vekaletname Bulunmas\u0131na Gerek yoktur. YARGITAY KARARI T.C YARGITAY.Ceza Genel KuruluEsas:…<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[871,638],"tags":[885,882,884,879,880,881],"yoast_head":"\nYarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 - Kurçalo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 - Kurçalo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 Vekaleti Olmayan Avukat Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lmakla \u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r. Ceza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda Avukat\u0131n Vekil Tayin Edildi\u011finin Mahkemeye Bildirmesi Yeterlidir. Sadece Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lan, Ba\u015fka Bir \u0130\u015flem Yapmayan Avukat,\u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r. Savunmas\u0131n\u0131 Avukat\u0131 ile Birlikte Yapan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Avukat\u0131nda Yaz\u0131l\u0131 Vekaletname Bulunmas\u0131na Gerek yoktur. YARGITAY KARARI T.C YARGITAY.Ceza Genel KuruluEsas:...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Kurçalo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100090344741598\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-10-06T00:45:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-10-06T01:03:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@KurcalogluHukuk\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@KurcalogluHukuk\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"21 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ddf08f3097e8bd7d3be1a8c42e2b7d4d\"},\"headline\":\"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-06T00:45:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-10-06T01:03:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/\"},\"wordCount\":4782,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png\",\"keywords\":[\"Ceza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda Avukat\u0131n Vekil Tayin Edildi\u011finin Mahkemeye Bildirmesi Yeterlidir.\",\"Sadece Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lan Avukat \u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r.\",\"Savunmas\u0131n\u0131 Avukat\u0131 ile Birlikte Yapan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Avukat\u0131nda Yaz\u0131l\u0131 Vekaletname Bulunmas\u0131na Gerek yoktur.\",\"Yarg\u0131tay CGK. E. 2016\/1421 K. 2020\/461\",\"Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131\",\"Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131 Avukat M\u00fcdafi\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Yarg\u0131tay B\u00fct\u00fcn Kategoriler\",\"Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Hukuku\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/\",\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 - Kurçalo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-10-06T00:45:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-10-06T01:03:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Anasayfa\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/\",\"name\":\"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners\",\"description\":\"Ceza hukuku- \u0130cra iflas hukuku, Miras hukuku, Bo\u015fanma hukuk, \u0130\u015f hukuku\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners\",\"alternateName\":\"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/cropped-cropped-cropped-Adsiz-tasarim-1-2-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/cropped-cropped-cropped-Adsiz-tasarim-1-2-1.png\",\"width\":245,\"height\":65,\"caption\":\"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100090344741598\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/KurcalogluHukuk\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/kurcalogluhukuk&partners\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/kurcalogluhukuk&Partners\/?hl=tr\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ddf08f3097e8bd7d3be1a8c42e2b7d4d\",\"name\":\"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4309b5148d08c537eb76f3942b5a6258?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4309b5148d08c537eb76f3942b5a6258?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/author\/av-burak-kurcaloglu\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 - Kurçalo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 - Kurçalo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners","og_description":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 Vekaleti Olmayan Avukat Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lmakla \u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r. Ceza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda Avukat\u0131n Vekil Tayin Edildi\u011finin Mahkemeye Bildirmesi Yeterlidir. Sadece Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lan, Ba\u015fka Bir \u0130\u015flem Yapmayan Avukat,\u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r. Savunmas\u0131n\u0131 Avukat\u0131 ile Birlikte Yapan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Avukat\u0131nda Yaz\u0131l\u0131 Vekaletname Bulunmas\u0131na Gerek yoktur. YARGITAY KARARI T.C YARGITAY.Ceza Genel KuruluEsas:...","og_url":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/","og_site_name":"Kurçalo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100090344741598","article_published_time":"2022-10-06T00:45:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-10-06T01:03:48+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png"}],"author":"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@KurcalogluHukuk","twitter_site":"@KurcalogluHukuk","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu","Estimated reading time":"21 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/"},"author":{"name":"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ddf08f3097e8bd7d3be1a8c42e2b7d4d"},"headline":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461","datePublished":"2022-10-06T00:45:40+00:00","dateModified":"2022-10-06T01:03:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/"},"wordCount":4782,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png","keywords":["Ceza Yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda Avukat\u0131n Vekil Tayin Edildi\u011finin Mahkemeye Bildirmesi Yeterlidir.","Sadece Bir Kez Duru\u015fmaya Kat\u0131lan Avukat \u201cM\u00fcdafiilik\u201d S\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131 Kazan\u0131r.","Savunmas\u0131n\u0131 Avukat\u0131 ile Birlikte Yapan San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Avukat\u0131nda Yaz\u0131l\u0131 Vekaletname Bulunmas\u0131na Gerek yoktur.","Yarg\u0131tay CGK. E. 2016\/1421 K. 2020\/461","Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131","Yarg\u0131tay Karar\u0131 Avukat M\u00fcdafi"],"articleSection":["Yarg\u0131tay B\u00fct\u00fcn Kategoriler","Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Hukuku"],"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/","url":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/","name":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461 - Kurçalo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png","datePublished":"2022-10-06T00:45:40+00:00","dateModified":"2022-10-06T01:03:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/Yargitay_logo.png"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/yargitay-cgk-e-2016-1421-k-2020-461\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Anasayfa","item":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yarg\u0131tay CGK., E. 2016\/1421, K. 2020\/461"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/","name":"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners","description":"Ceza hukuku- \u0130cra iflas hukuku, Miras hukuku, Bo\u015fanma hukuk, \u0130\u015f hukuku","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#organization","name":"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners","alternateName":"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners","url":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/cropped-cropped-cropped-Adsiz-tasarim-1-2-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/cropped-cropped-cropped-Adsiz-tasarim-1-2-1.png","width":245,"height":65,"caption":"Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu Hukuk & Partners"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=100090344741598","https:\/\/x.com\/KurcalogluHukuk","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/kurcalogluhukuk&partners","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/kurcalogluhukuk&Partners\/?hl=tr"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/person\/ddf08f3097e8bd7d3be1a8c42e2b7d4d","name":"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4309b5148d08c537eb76f3942b5a6258?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4309b5148d08c537eb76f3942b5a6258?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Av. Burak Kur\u00e7alo\u011flu"},"url":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/author\/av-burak-kurcaloglu\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14632"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14632"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14632\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14651,"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14632\/revisions\/14651"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kurcaloglu.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}